On
the nature of Planck's constant, physics has its „profoundly insightful“
analyses
and conclusions. However, they are nothing more than one big misunderstanding, a drastic violation of laws,
pseudoscience.
Energy is defined in a single way: E=m.с2 . In this sense, for an electromagnetic wave with frequency (f) (for any cyclic process) the relationship holds: dE/dt=d(m.c2)/dt , respectively, P=h.f [watt]. From here, the statutory form of the constant (h) is: h=Е0=m0.с2=m0.(λ.f)2 [w.s] (λ, f, с are the length, frequency, and speed of the wave).
– The power (P) of the wave process depends on the
frequency (f), which fact excludes the possibility of the same dependence at the energy (E).
.
– The (h=Е0)-constant represents a boundary
discrete portion of energy (of one wave period). –
The (m0)-constant is a corresponding
boundary discrete portion of mass
(particle
of the field matter).
The
formula P=h.f is obviously incompatible with that of today's physics E=h.f. We
should be aware that the correct definition of the energy of an electromagnetic
wave is: E=m.λ2.f2 (it
originates
from the laws E=m.с2 and λ.f=с). That is, the expression E=h.f
distorts the law E=m.λ2.f2, representing it as E=(m.λ2.f).f
. Exactly this inadmissible deformation leads to the artificial (non-existent)
dependence of energy on frequency, as well as to the meaningless expression in
parentheses called Planck's constant: h=m.λ2.f .
Figuratively speaking, in its
formula E=h.f, physics simply amputates one leg-(f) of the Goddess "Energy", applying
it as her crutch (forced dependence on the crutch).
And the remaining mutilated body (the expression in
brackets) calls Planck's constant: h=m.λ2.f (outside
the metaphor, this combination of quantities means nothing).
Fortunately, the creepy picture in question is only in our heads.
The energy of each oscillatory process is equal to the constant energy (h) of one oscillation, multiplied by the number of oscillations performed. And with the rises in the frequency (f) of the oscillations, the power of the action increases (this correlation has experimental confirmation).