Abstract: Natural laws are bifurcate
into special (physical) and general (principles, grounds). The Principle of Opposites
is a fundamental dependence. The same is appears
a Principle of Dualism and a Principle of Determination, because
opposites exist only in pairs and are determined one by the other. In obedience
to this framework, the main physical quantities form pairs of opposites:
energy-mass, length-time. From here, energy (E) can be determined
only by mass (m), and length (L) only by time (t) (qualitative determination), namely: E=m.с2 and L=t.с,
where the factors (с2) and (с) are proportionality coefficients (с –
speed of light). The
quantitative determination is between two levels of the same quality, namely:
E1=n.E2 ; m1=n.m2 . And for a stationary system
K(x,t) and a system K'(x',t') moving inertially along the axis (X) relative to
it: x'=N.x ; t'=N.t
, where (n) and (N) are numbers-coefficients of proportionality. According to
these principled qualitative-quantitative relationships, the law of the
electromagnetic wave energy E=h.f is incorrect. The same should be of the type:
E1=n.E2, respectively, E=n.h, where h=E0=m0.c2. According to them, the Special
Theory of Relativity is also inadequate in general. Lorentz transformations must be
of the form: x'=N.x ; t'=N.t . Through them it appears as a Special theory of Definiteness,
but corrupted by relativity. It is precisely because of the conflicting
interpretations that Planck's constant (h) is obtained with an undetermined
physical meaning, and Relativism is woven of paradoxes.
Videlicet,
these parts of physics are not scientifically supported.
Keywords: Principle of Opposites, Principle of Dualism, Principle
of Definiteness, Planck's constant, Democritus atom, Principle of Relativity,
Lorentz transformations
1.
Introduction
Science
in an undeniable way proves that the Process of development of matter proceeds
from the simple to the complex, where Consciousness also appears. It, in turn,
initiates a Cognitive Process in the opposite direction – from the complex to
the simple to closing of the circle. Thus, the first process forms a section
"going", which has material characteristics, and the second – a
section "returning", which is immaterial, cognitive, ideal (Principle
of Opposites, equivalent to Principle of Definiteness, respectively, to
Principle of circularity). Naturally, both sections concern physics most
directly.
In turn, the cognitive process moves oscillating –
generally speaking, between truths and untruths, as a series of closed
cognitive loops. Today, we already see it breaking through to material
structures of visible elementariness. And his entire path to here is strewn with opposites -
the steps without which descending into the depths of matter is impossible. In
this order, Knowledge also reveals the presence of a dualistic natural legality
– a unity of mutually determining special and general laws.
2.
The closed configuration of the Cognition
Consciousness
is obviously not some unique find in the Universe, but an irrevocable attribute
in its development, accomplishing a return to the beginning. In order to know the realities,
it takes a position against them, i.e. performs their filming in mirror symmetry (other possibility does not exist). These are reflections
in which the truth is turned upside down. Therefore, the Cognitive process does
not stop there, but continues with their straightening out – an implicit,
intra-brain transition-return to reality, with which the cognitive circuit closes
(the closure is always approximate). Before us is the cognitive mechanism
"double mirroring
reflection", the only possible way
of reproducing the true images (mirror images of mirror images).
In this sense, Cognition is an impossible to
metamorphosis closed three-step operation "start from an elevated
thesis-going to its opposite to produce an antithesis-synthesis returning to
the beginning, already as specified (determined) knowledge". We
explain this cognitive procedure for information of Relativistic physics, where
both real and mirror formulas are obtained. Their mixing leads to incorrect
conclusions, respectively, to confusing situations.
3. Essence
of the general natural laws
The
discovery of physical laws is undoubtedly
a great achievement. Let's take for example the formulations involving the
main physical quantities: L=t.c and E=m.c2, where (L) is the length,
(t) is the time, (E) is the energy, (m) is the mass and the factor (c) is the
speed of light. But this high scientific level is not the last. It is only a
ceiling of special knowledge. Above it stand still extremely important laws of
nature, unknown or poorly known to modern science (perhaps, due to their high
degree of commonality). It is they who form the higher natural legislation,
explaining the structure and way of functioning of the Worlds.
The
general laws of nature outline the framework of Objective Reality, outside of
which mental deceptions wander. Or, the general laws dictate
the rules by which the private are formed. Hence, the private natural laws are
necessarily contained in the general ones, respectively, they cannot violate
the general ones. This circumstance is a criterion of truth of the highest
order, not subject to abrogation or variation.
In particular, the interaction between private and general laws of nature
has the following causal character:
– Special natural laws provide a visual insight into How? specifically, as
formulas, the relationships between natural quantities appear – in the above
example, between the quantities "length (L) - time (t)" and
"energy (E) - mass (m)".
–
General natural laws reveal Why? the relationships between the natural quantities look
just like that, and not in any other way – in the above example, why the
quantities length (L) and energy (E) are found in relation
exactly to the
quantities time (t) and mass (m) and not to some others.
4. Principle
of opposites and its incarnations
Available scientific data and in-depth research on it allow us to judge
that opposites are everywhere in our surrounding reality. We will support this
with two pragmatic examples:
– The basic physical quantities, in fact, form pairs of opposites
"mass-energy", "length-time". Here we pay attention to the
global detail that in each such pair, one component is always of a material
nature (in this case, mass and length), and the other – of an immaterial, ideal
nature (in this case, energy and time). The "material-ideal" relation
is the basis of the opposition.
–
The essence of physical quantities is also dual – in the form (number).
(concept-scale). Since physics has no view of these features, for clarification
we will bifurcate
the
length and time as follows: Length represents "a certain number of spatial
scale units", respectively, "number of meters" or the dualism
(number).(meter).
Accordingly, time represents "a certain number of time scale units",
respectively "number of seconds" or the dualism (number).(second) (neither the meter and the
second intertwine, nor the numbers in front of them; there is nothing else to
intertwine).
Directly to the question, there can be no doubt that the
development of the entire Objective Reality (Nature, Society, Knowledge) is
subordinate to the supreme Principle of Oppositeness. The same actually appear a Principle of Dualism (of material-ideal dualism), because the opposites exist
only in pairs. The dual structure brings out another aspect of it – the
Principle of Determinism, since the two opposite sides are determined by each
other (this way is non-alternative).
At the same time, there must be limit beyond which
definiteness passes into the antipode indefiniteness. From definiteness derive the Principle of circularity, of
the closed configuration (without spatial and temporal closure, things are indeterminate
and therefore unknowable), the Principle of synonymity (only
one determination, one truth is obtained from one opposition) and the Principle
of cognizability (external reality is knowable, because it is fully defined).
5.
Material-ideal beginning
As
we have repeatedly mentioned, in its essence dualism is reduced to a single,
strictly fixed regularity – to the unity "material
manifestation-immaterial (ideal) manifestation". Before us is without
alternative, impossible to transformation, natural pattern that comes from the
depths of matter. This means that the process "development of matter"
starts from two interacting opposite beginnings – "material nature-ideal
nature". As the solely available creative material, the material-ideal
starting structure (a cell of a material core, with an immaterial surrounding
called a void) is carried over into the whole variety of the next derivative
production, from which emanates a Principle of Similarity: The
material gives rise to material forms, the ideal – ideality. And so until the
appearance of a material body-ideal consciousness, material male sex-ideal
female sex, etc. This duality opens up the possibility to determine the two
manifestations by the method: One through the other, in comparison with the
other, in contrast to the other. Other way to determine does not exist. A very
important element here is the bifurcation of the Principle of Determination
itself – a bifurcation of quantitative (material) determination and qualitative
(ideal) determination. Hence its full name is a Principle of
quantitative-qualitative determination.[1]
Such
is the legal framework with which physics must be aware and abide by. We say
this because since the beginning of the 20th century, at her meet
all
kinds of free interpretations. And, unfortunately, for a long time it has been
in striking deviations from the above objective limits of rational thinking
(leaning more on subjective ideas,
opinions
and the like, instead of legal grounds).
6.
Energy-mass mutually determination.
According
to the Principle of Definiteness, basic physical quantities cannot exist and
manifest in any other way than in pairs of opposites. Looking in depth, mass (m) and length (L) should be the material
components in these pairs, and energy (E) and time (t)
–
the ideal ones. Physics has already established the formal kind of these relations without
knowing why they look just like that. In them, mass
(m) corresponds to energy (E) and length (L) to time (t). Other combinations
are impossible. To be continued a visual reading of the energy-mass
relationship:
1. Qualitative
determination: Opposing qualities individuate material-ideal pairs in which
they are defined one by the other. This method of determination is the only one
possible.
– The ideal
quantity "energy (E)" is expressed (defined) by its opposite – the material
quantity "mass (m)" in the natural law: E=m.c2, respectively, m=E/с2 and E/m=с2 (determinative action goes in a
circle), where the factor (c2)
is a coefficient of proportionality (c – the speed of light). Other variants of this mutual determination are excluded
from the law: One pair of opposites – one determination. Or the ratio
E=m.c2 cannot be modified.
2. Quantification: The different quantities of a quality
individuate pairs of opposites in which they are defined one by the other. This
method of determination is the only one possible.
– The quantity "energy (E1)" is expressed (determined) by the
quantity "energy (E2)" in the natural law: E1=n.E2 , respectively,
E2=E1/n , where the factor (n) is a coefficient of proportionality (number).
Other variants of this mutual determination are excluded from the law: One pair
of opposites – one determination.
In
this line of thought, let's pay attention to M. Planck's formula for the energy
of the electromagnetic wave: [2]
E=h.f (1)
((h) is the Planck constant and (f) is the frequency of
the wave ; f=1/t or number of oscillations
(n) per unit time (t)). As can be clearly seen, here
physics is in violation of the law "One opposition - one
determination". At first glance, it seems as if she found a way to define
energy without its opposite, mass (mass does exist, but it is hidden in the
constant (h), evident from its dimension [J.s] or [kg.m2/s]). And since this simply cannot
be done, the conclusion is forced that there is something wrong with this
formula. According to the given examples, the same must be either of the form E=m.c2 or of the
form E1=n.E2.
7. Frequency as an attribute not of energy, but of power
of the wave process
Even at its nascency,
Quantum Physics falls into indefiniteness, arising mainly from the
fundamental Planck constant h, which appears devoid of physical
meaning. A
similar jumble are
and the stories with waves in absolutely empty
space (vacuum). The logic based on the Principle of Determination is
uncompromising. To receiving a wave, including
electromagnetic, two prerequisites are necessary: First, a material oscillator
for its occurrence. Second, a discontinuous material medium for its propagation
(there can be no wave without displacement of one part relative to another
part). And the Planck constant must have a physically clear status of a
material phenomenon.
We have already made it clear that formula (1) for the
electromagnetic wave energy cannot be true. The following situation is legal
here: There is an equal sign between the energy of the wave and the energy of
the oscillator that causes it. And the energy of the oscillator is obviously a result, is a sum of repeating
the energy of one oscillation many times.
Then what kind of phenomenon is the Planck constant (h)? There can be no doubt about its quantitative
determinacy (its fixed value). But we are not talking about an ordinary number
here. According to the dimension [J.s] or [kg.m2/s], it also has quality indicators. Why
don't they satisfy the Principle of Determination? Let's present the dimension
provocatively, in the form: [(kg.m2/s2).s].The mass (kg).
is obviously there. The speed of light squared (m2/s2=c2) also appeared,
which means that in this part the constant (h) has the defined meaning of
energy (E). But the prominent additional temporal dimension
(s) discredits this qualitative determinism.
Looks
like incorrectly included in the dimension in question. Why does this happen?
Are the ratios (energy).(time), respectively, (impulse).(coordinate), called an
indeterminate, quantum state, correct?
The
thorough analysis leads to the conclusion that the frequency (f) is not an
attribute of the energy, but of the power (P) of the wave process:
P=dE/dt=h.dn/dt
[watt] (2)
Videlicet,
the correct formula for the energy is:
E=n.E0=n.h=n.(m0.с2)
(3)
Thus, the constant (h) acquires the meaning of a boundary
discrete portion of energy: E0=h=m0.c2 – the
energy of one period. To her corresponds a boundary discrete portion of mass (m0)
– the indivisible atom of Democritus
(460
BC) (the ultimate small particle of field
matter). [3] Below these limits, uncertainty reigns. The very concepts
for energy and mass lose meaning.
From
(3), the inviolable organic relation will be in effect:
h/m0=с2
(4)
We summarize: The energy E of any periodic (cyclic) movement is equal
to the energy h* – const. of one period multiplied by the number (n) of periods. There are no reasons for exceptions to this rule,
introducing determinism into Quantum Physics. And interpretations of energy are
subject to reconsideration (for example, statements about particles with energy
but without mass or vice versa are untenable, and the energy of a body can
change solely by adding/deprivation mass).
8. Macroequivalents of the constant (h)
According
to the Principle of Similarity, we can use macro-cyclic processes to confirm the
above generalization.
To
illustrate the essence of the constant (h), we will give an example with
the AK-47.
We perform several trials with different firing frequency (different frequency of the
process sine wave). Result: Regardless of the firing frequency, the energy
released is always equal to the energy (h*) – const. of one charge, multiplied by
the number (n) of used charges (E=h*.n).
And
the electricity meter is based on the same dependence. It works by the formula:
(dE/dt).dt=dh*.n [watt.sec].
One
revolution of the disc realizes the constant energy (h*) (depends only on the
invariable dimensions of the disc and the material from which it is made). That
is why the device is not interested in the frequency of the
"rotation" process, but only counts the number (n) of rotations. That is, the energy expended is
always equal to the energy (h*) – const. of one rotation of the disc,
multiplied by the number (n) of rotations (E=h*.n).
We have a categorical conformity and at the internal combustion engine. Here (h*) is the
energy from one rotation of the crankshaft. Its constant value is due to the
invariable volume of the cylinders. Thus, the converted energy is always equal to the energy
(h*) – const. of
one revolution of the shaft, multiplied by the number (n) of the revolutions
made (E=h*.n). While engine power depends on frequency – P=h*.(number of
revolutions/per minute).
9. The absolutely stationary
system K0 called field matter
Material
particles (m0) cannot exist as a single ubiquitous quality. For
their distinct delineation and possibility of movement, such as reality is,
around each of them must be the opposite quality – some immaterial, ideal
emptiness. And since the immaterial, the empty, cannot be spatial, it should be
stretches by the very presence of the material particle as a core. This is how
the idea of a dualistic, force-stressed, primary cell of the initial material
medium arises (material core-empty surroundings, self-charged with energy, representing final spatial unit – a distance that can no longer be
divided into parts, but is traversed all at once). The same forms a space (Metagalaxy,
Hypersphere) of material-ideal lines of force. This is the one and only,
absolutely motionless system K0, with the ability of self-motion
within itself, expressed in a transverse oscillation of the mass (m0)
relative to the void. Or, in its deepest essence, any motion in a K0
system represents the propagation of a wave. Light is such a wave.
System
K0 is unavailable. All other inertial systems move relative to it. In this
sense, the contemporary definition of the speed of light contradicts the
Principle of Opposites. Since the clock is in a moving system, the measurement
of the light signal always takes place in the closed "going-return"
loop. So the speed (c) is the average speed of the signal along the loop.
Clocks cannot be synchronized with it (such absolute truth is achievable only
in the K0 system).
10. Principle of Definiteness at the inertial systems.
As the most general laws, the same Principles are valid
in the Relativism. Difference (oppositeness) leads to cognoscibility
due to the
possibility of mutual determination – determination of one side through the
other. In the case of identity, such an opportunity is absent. It is impenetrable, it means indeterminacy,
relativity. There are no proportions in it,
no mathematics. Here the legitimate question arises: How then does Special
Relativity enter the identity of its inertial systems and extract their
relations? Answer: Through total manipulation of thinking…by self-delusion of
course.
The
sensory-brain apparatus gives us understand minutely that the World around us
is built on the Principle of qualitative-quantitative determination. Therefore
it is knowable and measurable. This principle is everywhere, including in our
senses and consciousness – It conditions common sense. Whereas relativity means
indeterminacy, something unknowable, unfathomable to study. Realistically
speaking, upon the Principle of Relativity cannot step no logical beginning,
let alone to build an entire physical theory. Errors have been allowed here
that liable to removal.
10. Staging of the Principle of Relativity
Let's trace things from the beginning. From paragraph (2) of the Special Theory we quote [4]:
”The laws by which the states of
physical systems undergo change are not affected, whether these changes of
state be referred to the one or the other of two systems of co-ordinates in
uniform translatory motion.”
Before us is the visible side
of the staging – "...the one or the other of two systems of
co-ordinates in uniform translatory motion...". There is, however, one more system that remains
hidden, but without which this staging cannot be realized, namely: In order to
present his first postulate - the moving relative to each other inertial
systems K' and K'' – the Author has taken a position in a third system K, which
is stationary, opposite to the two. There is no other way of presenting
(determining) the movement of systems K' and K''.
In
reality, the staging is as follows: A system K'(x', t') moves inertially with
velocity (v) to the right along the (X) axis of a stationary system K(x, t). System K''(x'', t'') moves
inertially with velocity (v) to the left along the axis (X) of system K(x, t).
11.
Relativity and definiteness in the formulation of the Principle of Relativity
Due
to the "rest-motion" distinction, the situation between the moving
systems (K' , K'') on the one hand, and the stationary system (K) on the other
is completely defined. The mathematical solution between the two sides giving
the difference is called Lorentz transformations. The same determine the
characteristics of (K', K''), relative to those of (K). This is the
"definiteness" part of the staging.
The
relation-definiteness (K'/K)=the relation-definiteness (K''/K) - systems (K' ;
K'') relate equally to system (K) because they move with the same speed (v) relative
to it (the different directions of
(v) are not relevant). From the equality of the relations K'/K=K''/K, the
identity K'=K'' will be valid
–
the systems are identical, precisely in the sense of the Principle of Relativity (which
is evident when their velocities are in the same direction). That is, between
systems (K') and (K'') there is no mathematics, there
are no transformations – K'/K''=K''/K'=1,
respectively, x'=x'' and t'=t''. No other
result can be obtained with them. This is the "relativity" part of the staging. With the equalities shown, the
Theory ends.
12.
Manipulation of the rest-motion antipodes.
However, the author begins to improvise. Contrary to
logic, he wants to distinguish the same moving systems (K') and (K'') (equal but different). For this purpose, he assumes
that, at the inertial systems, motion and rest are the same state, i.e. that "rest" is a
conditional name. Thus, one of the systems can be called resting in quotation
marks, which means resting seemingly, fictitiously, allegedly, just for convenience.
This is exactly what we read in paragraph (1) of the
Theory (quote) [5]:
„Let us take
a system of co-ordinates in which the equations of Newtonian mechanics hold
good. In order to render our presentation more precise and to distinguish this
system of co-ordinates verbally from others which will be introduced hereafter,
we call it the “stationary system”.“
In
this way, the Author directs thinking and actions in the direction: What is
between systems (K' ; K'') is the same between systems (K' ; K) from the staging
of the Principle of Relativity. So that farther starts working with this
"more precise representation". According to him, the two systems
stand in opposition "only verbally". He is in complete nescience that
this is already a terminology describing the situation of difference, of
definiteness.
13. Lorentz transformations as a product of rest-motion
definiteness
Mathematics, as an objective science, does not understand by the stated conventions. In relativity between systems,
it does not work. With the definiteness created by the two different systems,
however, immediately begins to look for what the difference consists of. As a
result, it
arrives at the solution called Lorentz transformations. In this situation, it
is reasonable to express the standpoint: As soon as the definiteness between the systems is
fictitious, then the Lorentz transformations are also fictitious. Everything
else is beyond the scope of normal thinking.
However,
the Author takes the illogical position that the difference-definiteness
between the systems is conditional, unreal, but the Lorentz transformations are completely regular.
Normality then requires that we reverse the reasoning: As soon as the Lorentz
transformations are a real achievement, then the definiteness between the
systems is also real. This fact makes it clear that the Author literally follows
the Principle of Definiteness. In a word, he starts with the Principle of
Relativity, but then, without suspecting it, abandons it and builds his Theory
on the Principle of Definiteness.
14. Emergence of the paradoxes in the Special Relativity
The Author uses the Principle of Definiteness only until obtaining the Lorentz transformations. The latter are the face of the difference between a stationary system K and a system K' moving relative to it. In this determination, the symmetry is mirror (observations from K' to K are reverse, mirror images of observations from K to K'). When observed from the stationary system K, the meter, second and kilogram of the moving system K' actually decrease, due to the movement. And when observed from the moving system K', the meter, second, and kilogram of the stationary system K mirror increase (there is no reason for their change, but, measured by the reduced parameters of K', those of K appear increased). This opposite comes to light when we move the Michelson-Morley experiment into the stationary Ether (system K) and observe it from the moving Earth (system K').[6]
However, the Author's reasoning goes in a different
direction – against the really fixed difference-determination between a
stationary system (K) and a system moving relative to it (K'), against the fact
that the mentioned systems represent two opposite points of view. He holds the
thesis that the pair of rest-motion systems (K ; K') is in fact that one pair
of motion-motion systems (K' ; K'') from the definition of the Principle of
Relativity, since rest is a fictitious state. That is why his next step is again
strikingly illogical – a return to the Principle of Relativity by unifying
viewpoints (the phenomenon of "both difference and identity"). So it
comes to an a priori introduction of real symmetry (the observations from K' to
K are identical to the observations from K to K') in place of the mirror (the
observations from K' to K are the opposite of the observations from K to K').
This unnatural operation gives life to the famous paradoxes. This unnatural
operation gives life to the famous paradoxes. Their unsoundness can be demonstrated with a series of thought
experiments.[7]
15.
Length-time mutual determination
According to the staging, before us are a stationary system K(x,t) and a system
K'(x',t') moving inertially along the axis (X) with speed (v) (the coordinate
(x) is the length (L)). The output quantities (x, t) are fully defined. The speed (c) of light is also
determined. And the Lorentz transformations proposed by the Special Theory of
Relativity are of the form
[8]:
x'=(x-v.t)/b and t'=(t-v.x/с2)/b where b=(1- v2/с2)1/2 (6)
Expressions
(6) represent the reverse point of view system K' (coordinate (x) and time (t)
measured with the scales of system K').
In
systems K(x,t) and K'(x',t'), the following relationships are in force: respectively, x=c.t and
x'=c.t'. It should a demonstrative reading of the qualitative coordinate-time
mutual determination and the quantitative coordinate K'-coordinate K , time
K'-time K (we simply duplicate the reasoning from the quantum section):
1. Qualitative determination: As we have noted, opposite qualities individuate
material-ideal pairs in which one is determined by the other. This method of determination is
the only one possible.
–
The material quantity "coordinate (x)" is expressed (defined) by its
opposite – the ideal quantity "time (t)" in the natural law: x=t.c ,
respectively, t=x/c and x/t=c (the determining action rotates in a circle),
where the factor (c) is a proportionality coefficient. Other variants of this mutual
determination are excluded from the law: One pair of opposites – one
determination. That
is, the relation x=t.c cannot be modified.
2. Quantitative determination: The different quantities
of a quality individuate pairs of opposites in which one is determined by the
other. This method of determination is
the only one possible. In this case, such quantification represent the Lorentz
transformations, resolved to the end by the qualitative determination of length
and time: x=t.c , respectively, t=x/c . Besides, the synonymous ratios are obtained:
x'=N.x and t'=N.t where N=(1- v2/с2)1/2/(1+ v2/с2)1/2 (7)
(respectively: x=x'/N and t=t'/N – a point of view system K).
Or in text form:
– The quantities of length (x') and time (t') are
expressed (determined) by the quantities of length (x) and time (t) in the
natural law Lorentz transformations: x'=N.x ; t'=N.t . The factor (N) is a proportionality coefficient (number). Other variants of this mutual
determination are excluded from the law: One pair of opposites – one
determination.
16. Conclusion
Contemporary Physics is in deep conflict with the general laws of nature in the face of the Principle of opposites, respectively, of quantitative-qualitative determination. This speaks of a heavy deficit of truthfulness. By comparison, the most accurate and objective science, Mathematics, is in full sync with the stated general laws (it derives from them, is their reflection). Let us repeat: The universe is subject to a Principle of Oppositeness, which is a Principle of quantitative-qualitative determination. According to this reality, Special Relativity is flawed in its very conception. And Planck's constant (h) gets the meaning of a boundary portion of energy (h=E0), corresponding to a boundary portion of mass (m0) – the indivisible atom of Democritus. Mass (m0) and energy (h=E0) are uncreateable and indestructible. They only pass from a potential state to a kinetic state and vice versa - a process outlining the infinite reversibility of the stationary K0 system (a material process "centrifugal expansion" is followed by an ideal process "centripetal contraction" and vice versa). The energy/mass ratio (E0/m0=E/m=c2 – const.), respectively, ideal/material factor, is inviolable. We strongly emphasize all this, given the unprincipled handling of these quantities. Neither energy nor mass has an independent existence. The mass (m0) with the energy (E0=h) are in every point of space, forming a system K0 – a force field, a simple binary substance. Primary cells of material cores, with immaterial (ideal) surroundings and force between them (nuclear model) are the prototype of all subsequent formations.
References
[1]. Николов А. – Към смяна на идеите във философията и
физиката,
С. 1999, част II, стр. 178-278
(A..Nikolov – Towards a change of ideas in philosophy and physics,
Sofia 1999,
part II, pp. 178-278)
[2]
Джианколи Д. – Физика, Москва
1989, част 2, стр. 500-503
(D. Giancoli – Physics, Moscow
1989,
Vol. 2, pp. 500-503)
[3]
Радев
Р. – Антична
философия, С.1988, стр. 97-108, 132-148
(R. Radev – Ancient Philosophy, Sofia 1988, pp. 97-108, 132-148)
[4] Einstein A. – On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies, §
2 http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
[5] Einstein A. – On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies, §
1 http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
[6] Николов
А. – Към
смяна на идеите във философията и физиката, С. 1999, част III, стр. 365-376
(A..Nikolov – Towards a change of ideas in philosophy and physics,
Sofia 1999,
part III, pp. 365-376)
[7] Николов
А. – Към
смяна на идеите във философията и физиката, С. 1999, част III, стр. 377-380
(A..Nikolov – Towards a change of ideas in philosophy and physics,
Sofia 1999,
part III, pp. 377-380)
[8] Einstein
A. – On the
Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies, § 3
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Александър Николов © 2010-2024 Всички права запазени (COPYRIGHT © 2010-2024)
