Abstract: The article shows Planck's constant from the inside, respectively, discloses its origin and specifies its structure, namely: The material quantity “mass-(m)” forms an antipodal pair with the immaterial quantity “energy-(E)”. That is why the two quantities are mutually determined: E=m.с2. There is no other way of determination. The energy of the electromagnetic wave is determined in exactly the same way. But here the speed-(c) is expressed through the length-(λ) and frequency-(f) of the wave: Е=m.λ2.f2. The energy-(E) does not depend on the frequency-(f) (because λ.f=c – const.). The starting quantum formula (E=h.f) is incorrect because it represents the law E=m.λ2.f2 as E=(m.λ2.f).f . It thus forcibly introduces a dependence of the energy on the frequency, and the expression in brackets, which apparently no longer means anything, calls the Planck constant: h=m.λ2.f . While the correct relationship is: P=h.f [watt], with a statutory form of Planck's constant: h=Е0=m0.с2=m0.(λ.f)2 [w.s]. The (h=Е0)-constant represents a boundary discrete portion of energy (of one wave period). The (m0)-constant is a corresponding boundary discrete portion of mass (particle of the field matter). These are the facts. But today's dogmatic thinking ignores them.
Keywords: energy, mass, Planck's constant, Democritus' atom
The material
quantity “mass-(m)” forms an antipodal pair with the immaterial quantity
“energy-(E)”. Therefore, the two quantities are mutually determined: E=m.с2.
Videlicet, the way of determining the energy-(E) is one and ounly – through the mass-(m) and speed-(c) in the following familiar order:
E=m.c2 law (1), type (1)
The energy of the electromagnetic wave is determined in exactly the same way. But here the speed-(c) is expressed through the length-(λ) and frequency-(f) of the wave:
How does the starting quantum proposition (E=h.f) fit into this reality?
It speaks of ambiguity on the
issue (explainable for those distant times). As a result, physics institutes
this third type of law (1) – a distorted form of type (2):
Е=(m.λ2.f).f law (1), type (3)
This expression is mathematically impeccable. But, besides mathematics, something else is necessary. The combination (λ.f=c) is the material-ideal mutual determination "length (L)-time (t)": L=t.c – law (2), the violation (dismemberment) of which is inadmissible. And today's physics does exactly that. Figuratively speaking, in type (3) it simply amputates one leg-(f) of the Goddess "Energy", applying it as her crutch (forced dependence on the crutch). And the remaining mutilated body (the expression in brackets) calls Planck's constant: h=m.λ2.f (outside of the metaphor this expression means nothing, it is meaningless). Fortunately, the creepy picture in question is only in our heads.
So, for a wave process with frequency (f) the correct relationship is (directly from the law E=m.c2): dE/dt=d(m.c2)/dt, respectively, P=h.f [watt]. Therefore, the statutory form of Planck's constant is: h=Е0=m0.с2=m0.(λ.f)2 [w.s].
– The (h=Е0)-constant represents a boundary discrete portion of energy (of one wave period).
–
The (m0)-constant is a corresponding
boundary discrete portion of mass
(particle
of the field matter – the indivisible atom of Democritus).
These are the facts. But today's dogmatic thinking ignores them.
Nothing! As the Great Roman said: "Alea iacta est."
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Александър Николов © 2010-2025 Всички права запазени (COPYRIGHT © 2010-2025)
Няма коментари:
Публикуване на коментар