REMOVING THE MAKE-UP (17) OF THE SPECIAL THEORY: ON THE TRAIL OF TRANSFORMATION FOR TIME IN THE INERTIAL SYSTEMS

Abstract     (MT)

Relativity of the inertial systems only determines a transition from a stationary system K_peace – K_p(x_p, t_p) into moving K_motion – K_m(x_m, t_m). This is because an each observer builds a thesis (step 1) into the its own system, which is always stationary to him. The other moves and he passes into it to form an antithesis (step 2). In this order the relationship between the times is: t_m=1/b(t_p-v.x_p/c²), where b=(1-v²/c²)^1/2 – transition from К_p in К_m, relatively moving viewpoint К_m (the relativity excludes transformation into a stationary system).

Keywords: special theory, relative time.

EXPOSITION

Now we will show the way in which scientists enforce on Einstein's incorrect conclusion for time and so more than one hundred years sow delusion and chaos in the science – presumably because of a misunderstanding of relativity. It is necessary to gain an insight into the words of the original & 3 (A. Einstein – On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies, 1905, part I, §3, http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/). We quote itself paragraph:

§ 3. Theory of the Transformation of Co-ordinates and Times from a Stationary System to another System in Uniform Motion of Translation Relatively to the Former

As plainly as anything! Relativity of the inertial systems only determines a transition from a stationary system K_peace – K_p(x_p, t_p) into moving K_motion – K_m(x_m, t_m). This is because an each observer builds a thesis (step 1) into the its own system, which is always stationary to him. The other moves and he passes into it to form an antithesis (step 2). In this order the relationship between the times is:

t_m=1/b(t_p-v.x_p/c²) – transition from К_p in К_m, relatively moving viewpoint К_m   (1Т)

However, the scientists are literally implicate in the concretization "Inertial system K'(x', t') is moving to the right towards a stationary system K(x, t) with velocity v along the axes X'ºX." They do not realize the relativity of the indications of the systems and fix them as a stationary K and moving K'. The result is appearing the deceitful set of transformations which becomes sacred to the official science:

t'=1/b(t-v.x/c²) – moving viewpoint К'      (1Т) 

t=1/b(t'+v.x'/c²) – stationary viewpoint К       (2Т)    

How convenient are these formulas...with an option to decide when as being necessary! If the Einstein's conclusion was t=t'.b, the physicists would use (1T). But because it is t'=t.b, they operate with (2T) (incidentally, why they properly work with (1T) in the conclusion about the length??). What a convincingly, mature, independently thinking! Let us repeat: The relativity excludes transformation into a stationary system (the same is an attribute of the Principle of Opposites). In the case in accordance with its objective presence, the correct estimate is:

Observer K is making a transition in the moving for it system K'.

t'=1/b(t-v.x/c²) – moving viewpoint К'      (1Т)

Observer K' is making a transition in the mirrored moving for it system K.

t=1/b(t'+v.x'/c²) – mirrored moving viewpoint К      (1Т)

This is the meaning of relativity. Its philosophy is based only on thesis and antithesis (without a synthesis returning). From (1T) it is obvious that will be available always t_m>t_p, respectively, t'>t (second K'<second K – time K' is accelerating). That is, the Einstein's conclusion of time is categorically incorrect.